Ok or ok - Putnam's way to essentialism

Weng Fang Wang*

*此作品的通信作者

研究成果: Article同行評審

摘要

Hilary Putnam made the claim several times that the direct reference theory (DRT) he endorsed had startling consequences for the theory of necessary truth and essentialism. If DRT was correct, so he claimed, it followed that things belonging to natural kinds had their deep structures necessarily. Inspired by Keith Donnellan, Nathan Salmon tried to spell out what Putnam seemed to have in mind when making the claim, and Salmon called the result of his analysis "the OK mechanism." Salmon showed that it was not DRT, but some other essentialism-entailing premise, that had the claimed startling consequences in the OK mechanism. In this paper, I argue that Salmon's OK is not the right interpretation of Putnam's intended mechanism. Instead, I present Putnam's intention as the OK* mechanism, and show that, in OK*, DRT does have the claimed startling consequences when supplemented only with other metaphysically innocent, purely empirically verifiable premises.

原文English
頁(從 - 到)236-250
頁數15
期刊Journal of Philosophical Research
30
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 2005

指紋

深入研究「Ok or ok - Putnam's way to essentialism」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此