TY - JOUR
T1 - Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot
T2 - A comparative study
AU - Shih, Yi Fen
AU - Chen, Chao Yin
AU - Chen, Wen Yin
AU - Lin, Hsiu Chen
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by National Yang-Ming University, a grant from Ministry of Education, Aim for the Top University Plan 97A-C-D11, and by the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 100-2911-I-010 -011).
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: A high percentage of young children present with flatfeet. Although the percentage of those with flatfeet declines with age, about 15% of the population maintains a flat arch. A reduction in longitudinal arch height usually combines with excessive subtalar joint pronation and may be related to other musculoskeletal problems of the lower extremity kinetic chain. The purpose of this study is to describe and compare the lower extremity kinematics between children with normal arches and those with flexible flatfeet, with the intent of providing practical information for decision making when treating children with flexible flatfeet. Methods. Twenty children with flexible flatfeet (years age mean (SD), 9.7 (0.9) years) and 10 children with normal arches (yeas age mean (SD), 9.6 (1.2) years) were included. Kinematic data (maximum and minimum angles, and movement range, velocity, and excursion) of the hip, knee and rearfoot were collected during walking using Liberty Electromagnetic Tracking System. Kinematic variables were compared between the normal arches and flexible flatfeet groups using repeated measures mixed effects ANOVA. Results: Movement patterns at the hip, knee and ankle joints were similar between children with flexible flatfeet and with normal arches. The results of ANOVA showed no significant main effect or interaction in any of the kinematic variables (P 0.05). Conclusions: This study identified no kinematic adaptation during walking in children with flexible flatfoot. We suggested that future research should take the influence of the mid-foot and forefoot into consideration when examining lower extremity kinematics in children with flexible flatfoot.
AB - Background: A high percentage of young children present with flatfeet. Although the percentage of those with flatfeet declines with age, about 15% of the population maintains a flat arch. A reduction in longitudinal arch height usually combines with excessive subtalar joint pronation and may be related to other musculoskeletal problems of the lower extremity kinetic chain. The purpose of this study is to describe and compare the lower extremity kinematics between children with normal arches and those with flexible flatfeet, with the intent of providing practical information for decision making when treating children with flexible flatfeet. Methods. Twenty children with flexible flatfeet (years age mean (SD), 9.7 (0.9) years) and 10 children with normal arches (yeas age mean (SD), 9.6 (1.2) years) were included. Kinematic data (maximum and minimum angles, and movement range, velocity, and excursion) of the hip, knee and rearfoot were collected during walking using Liberty Electromagnetic Tracking System. Kinematic variables were compared between the normal arches and flexible flatfeet groups using repeated measures mixed effects ANOVA. Results: Movement patterns at the hip, knee and ankle joints were similar between children with flexible flatfeet and with normal arches. The results of ANOVA showed no significant main effect or interaction in any of the kinematic variables (P 0.05). Conclusions: This study identified no kinematic adaptation during walking in children with flexible flatfoot. We suggested that future research should take the influence of the mid-foot and forefoot into consideration when examining lower extremity kinematics in children with flexible flatfoot.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862800687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2474-13-31
DO - 10.1186/1471-2474-13-31
M3 - Article
C2 - 22381254
AN - SCOPUS:84862800687
SN - 1471-2474
VL - 13
JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
M1 - 31
ER -