Integrating TOPSIS and DEMATEL methods to rank the risk of failure of FMEA

Kuei Hu Chang*, Yung-Chia Chang, Yu Tsai Lee


研究成果: Article同行評審

46 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)


Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the risk analysis techniques recommended by international quality certification systems, such as ISO 9000, ISO/TS 16949, CE, and QS9000. Most current FMEA methods use the risk priority number (RPN) value to evaluate the risk of failure. The RPN value is the mathematical product of the three parameters of a failure mode that is rated between 1 and 10 in terms of its severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D), respectively. However, the RPN method has been found with three main drawbacks: (1) high duplicate RPN values, (2) failure to consider the ordered weights of S, O, and D, and (3) failure to consider the direct and indirect relationships between the failure modes and causes of failure. Therefore, this paper integrates the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach to rank the risk of failure. A case of an inlet plate ring that has been drawn from a professional mechanical factory is presented to further illustrate the proposed approach. After comparing the result that was obtained from the proposed method with the conventional RPN and DEMATEL methods, it was found that the proposed method can resolve the abovementioned RPN ranking issues and give a more appropriate risk assessment than other listed approaches to provide valuable information for the decision makers.

頁(從 - 到)1229-1257
期刊International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making
出版狀態Published - 16 11月 2014


深入研究「Integrating TOPSIS and DEMATEL methods to rank the risk of failure of FMEA」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。