TY - GEN
T1 - Im receptivity and presentation-type preferences among users of a mobile app with automated receptivity-status adjustment
AU - Wu, Ting Wei
AU - Chien, Yu Ling
AU - Lee, Hao Ping
AU - Chang, Yung Ju
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 ACM.
PY - 2021/5/6
Y1 - 2021/5/6
N2 - Researchers have long attempted to estimate instant-messaging (IM) users' attentiveness, responsiveness, and interruptibility. Yet, IM users' self-presentation of their receptivity, and their perceptions of automated adjustment/revelation of their receptivity status (e.g., Facebook Messenger's green dot that deems a user to be active), remain under-explored. We therefore told our 43 participants that our IM app, IMStatus, was capable of automatically estimating and adjusting their receptivity status to responsive, attentive, or interruptible based on their smartphone activity. These statuses were also presented to their IM contacts in three diferent styles. Over a two-week period, the participants rarely chose the status interruptible, and when they did, it was usually to indicate low availability. Textual presentation was usually chosen to express statuses precisely, especially at high and lowextremes of receptivity; while graphical and numeric presentations were preferred when self-perceived receptivity levels were more ambiguous. Conficts between recipients' and senders' perspectives are also discussed.
AB - Researchers have long attempted to estimate instant-messaging (IM) users' attentiveness, responsiveness, and interruptibility. Yet, IM users' self-presentation of their receptivity, and their perceptions of automated adjustment/revelation of their receptivity status (e.g., Facebook Messenger's green dot that deems a user to be active), remain under-explored. We therefore told our 43 participants that our IM app, IMStatus, was capable of automatically estimating and adjusting their receptivity status to responsive, attentive, or interruptible based on their smartphone activity. These statuses were also presented to their IM contacts in three diferent styles. Over a two-week period, the participants rarely chose the status interruptible, and when they did, it was usually to indicate low availability. Textual presentation was usually chosen to express statuses precisely, especially at high and lowextremes of receptivity; while graphical and numeric presentations were preferred when self-perceived receptivity levels were more ambiguous. Conficts between recipients' and senders' perspectives are also discussed.
KW - Availability
KW - Mobile receptivity
KW - Presence
KW - Receptivity-status adjustment system
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106758235&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3411764.3445209
DO - 10.1145/3411764.3445209
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85106758235
T3 - Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings
BT - CHI 2021 - Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Making Waves, Combining Strengths, CHI 2021
Y2 - 8 May 2021 through 13 May 2021
ER -