TY - JOUR
T1 - Histogram analysis of prostate cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
T2 - A preliminary study emphasizing on zonal difference
AU - Lai, Chih Ching
AU - Huang, Pin Hsun
AU - Wang, Fu Nien
AU - Shen, Shu Huei
AU - Wang, Hsin Kai
AU - Liu, Hsian Tzu
AU - Chung, Hsiao Jen
AU - Lin, Tzu Ping
AU - Chang, Yen Hwa
AU - Pan, Chin Chen
AU - Peng, Shin Lei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2019 Lai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Background This study evaluated the performance of histogram analysis in the time course of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differentiating cancerous tissues from benign tissues in the prostate. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the histograms of DCE-MRI of 30 patients. Histograms within regions of interest(ROI) in the peripheral zone (PZ) and transitional zone (TZ) were separately analyzed. The maximum difference wash-in slope (MWS) and delay phase slope (DPS) were defined for each voxel. Differences in histogram parameters, namely the mean, standard deviation (SD), the coefficient of variation (CV), kurtosis, skewness, interquartile range (IQR), percentile (P10, P25, P75, P90, and P90P10), Range, and modified full width at half-maximum (mFWHM) between cancerous and benign tissues were assessed. Results In the TZ, CV for ROIs of 7.5 and 10mm was the only significantly different parameter of the MWS (P = 0.034 and P = 0.004, respectively), whereas many parameters of the DPS (mean, skewness, P10, P25, P50, P75 and P90) differed significantly (P = <0.001-0.016 and area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73-0.822). In the PZ, all parameters of the MWS exhibited significant differences, except kurtosis and skewness in the ROI of 7.5mm(P = <0.001-0.017 and AUC = 0.865-0.898). SD, IQR, mFWHM, P90P10 and Range were also significant differences in the DPS (P = 0.001-0.035). Conclusion The histogram analysis of DCE-MRI is a potentially useful approach for differentiating prostate cancer from normal tissues. Different histogram parameters of the MWS and DPS should be applied in the TZ and PZ.
AB - Background This study evaluated the performance of histogram analysis in the time course of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differentiating cancerous tissues from benign tissues in the prostate. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the histograms of DCE-MRI of 30 patients. Histograms within regions of interest(ROI) in the peripheral zone (PZ) and transitional zone (TZ) were separately analyzed. The maximum difference wash-in slope (MWS) and delay phase slope (DPS) were defined for each voxel. Differences in histogram parameters, namely the mean, standard deviation (SD), the coefficient of variation (CV), kurtosis, skewness, interquartile range (IQR), percentile (P10, P25, P75, P90, and P90P10), Range, and modified full width at half-maximum (mFWHM) between cancerous and benign tissues were assessed. Results In the TZ, CV for ROIs of 7.5 and 10mm was the only significantly different parameter of the MWS (P = 0.034 and P = 0.004, respectively), whereas many parameters of the DPS (mean, skewness, P10, P25, P50, P75 and P90) differed significantly (P = <0.001-0.016 and area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73-0.822). In the PZ, all parameters of the MWS exhibited significant differences, except kurtosis and skewness in the ROI of 7.5mm(P = <0.001-0.017 and AUC = 0.865-0.898). SD, IQR, mFWHM, P90P10 and Range were also significant differences in the DPS (P = 0.001-0.035). Conclusion The histogram analysis of DCE-MRI is a potentially useful approach for differentiating prostate cancer from normal tissues. Different histogram parameters of the MWS and DPS should be applied in the TZ and PZ.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061509507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0212092
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0212092
M3 - Article
C2 - 30753222
AN - SCOPUS:85061509507
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 14
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 2
M1 - e0212092
ER -