The authors apologize for a mistake in the definition of the handedness of circular polarization used in the original manuscript. It turns out that the handedness should be opposite: r-CPL and l-CPL are correctly l-CPL and r-CPL, respectively. The mistake causes the notation of the handedness of circular polarization to be reversed in the TOC/abstract graphic, Table 1, and Figures 3 and 4, and some statements in the main text need to be reversed and corrected. Also, one of the two possible mechanisms for enantioselectivity on chiral crystallization that we proposed in the original Letter becomes negative, and another mechanism becomes more plausible. In other words, we have made one step forward in understanding the actual mechanism of enantioselectivity on chiral crystallization by plasmonic manipulation. The authors note here that this change does not in any way affect the main results that high crystal enantiomeric excess in chiral crystallization is achieved by plasmonic manipulation. The corrected TOC, table, figures, and statements in the main text are provided here.