Comparison of SDN OpenFlow network simulator and emulators: EstiNet vs. Mininet

Shie-Yuan Wang*

*此作品的通信作者

研究成果: Conference contribution同行評審

42 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

In this paper, we compare and evaluate the correctness, performance, and scalability of EstiNet OpenFlow simulator, EstiNet OpenFlow emulator, and Mininet OpenFlow emulator over a set of grid networks. The popular Floodlight OpenFlow controller is used without any modification to control the simulated/emulated OpenFlow switches created in these tools. We performed experiments over a set of N × N grid networks, where N = 5, 6,..., 31 and used the real-world ping program to observe whether the average RTTs reported by these ping packets are correct or not over these tools. We found that in EstiNet simulation, the simulated results of the average RTT are always correct and repeatable, but EstiNet simulator needs more time to finish the simulation when the network size becomes larger. As for emulation, we found that Mininet emulator generated strange results that cannot be explained over some network sizes. In addition, Mininet emulator spends a huge amount of time on its program launch, network setup, and resource releasing when the network size is large. As for EstiNet emulator, we found that it generated good performance and scalability and it used less time to obtain results.

原文English
主出版物標題2014 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC 2014 - Proceedings
發行者Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN(電子)9781479942787
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 26 九月 2014
事件19th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC 2014 - Funchal, Portugal
持續時間: 23 六月 201426 六月 2014

出版系列

名字Proceedings - International Symposium on Computers and Communications
ISSN(列印)1530-1346

Conference

Conference19th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC 2014
國家/地區Portugal
城市Funchal
期間23/06/1426/06/14

指紋

深入研究「Comparison of SDN OpenFlow network simulator and emulators: EstiNet vs. Mininet」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此