Check the Report and Comments: The Veracity Assessment of Unfamiliar News on Social Media

Huai Kuan Zeng, Tai Yee Wu*, David J. Atkin

*此作品的通信作者

研究成果: Article同行評審

摘要

Given growing concerns regarding the spread of medical misinformation, the current research set out to assess the message effects of social media news on reader veracity assessments. A 2 (news report with hedging vs. without hedging) by 3 (uncivil vs. civil vs. no comments) between-subject experiment on Facebook users was conducted (valid N = 824). Results reveal that news hedging was more predictive of perceived credibility, news sharing, and fact-checking tendencies than was comment incivility. Hedged reporting was also found to elevate perceived news credibility, which in turn predicted a greater likelihood of news sharing. Moreover, perceived credibility increased fact-checking tendency only when the news was reported with hedged messages. These findings indicate that when readers encounter an unfamiliar health news issue, the content of news played a more important role in veracity assessment than the style of reader comments.

原文English
期刊Digital Journalism
DOIs
出版狀態Accepted/In press - 2022

指紋

深入研究「Check the Report and Comments: The Veracity Assessment of Unfamiliar News on Social Media」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此