TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure after latanoprost 0.005% or Brimonidine tartrate 0.2% in Normal-tension glaucoma patients
AU - Liu, Catherine Jui ling
AU - Ko, Yu Chieh
AU - Cheng, Ching Yu
AU - Chiu, Allen W.
AU - Chou, Joe C.
AU - Hsu, Wen Ming
AU - Liu, Jorn Hon
PY - 2002/12/1
Y1 - 2002/12/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of latanoprost 0.005% once daily and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% twice daily in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). Design: A randomized, open-label, crossover study. Participants: Twenty-eight NTG patients with progressive visual field defects/optic disc excavation, new disc hemorrhage, or field defects that threatened fixation. Intervention: Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were treated with latanoprost, lubricant, and brimonidine for 4 weeks each, whereas patients in group 2 were treated with brimonidine, lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each. Main Outcome Measures: Intraocular pressure (IOP), pulse rate, and blood pressure were measured at 8 am, 12 noon, and 4 pm after each 4-week treatment. Ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated. Results: Latanoprost and brimonidine reduced the average IOP by 3.6 ± 1.9 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 2.5 ± 1.3 mmHg (P <0.001), respectively, with a significant difference between the two regimens (P = 0.009). Both drugs significantly reduced IOP at each time point. Latanoprost decreased IOP significantly more than did brimonidine at 8 am (11.7 ± 2.2 mmHg vs. 13.7 ± 2.1 mmHg, P = 0.004) and 4 pm (11.4 ± 2.1 mmHg vs. 13.2 ± 2.9 mmHg, P = 0.004), but IOP was equal between the two agents at 12 noon (11.5 ± 2.6 mmHg vs. 11.5 ± 2.3 mmHg, P = 0.967). IOP was maintained at 12 mmHg or lower in 18 (66.7%) of 27 patients after treatment with latanoprost and in 9 (33.3%) of 27 patients after treatment with brimonidine. Latanoprost monotherapy reduced IOP by 30% in 8 patients (29.6%), but brimonidine monotherapy did not reduce IOP by that much in any of the patients. OPP increased after latanoprost treatment (P < 0.001) but did not increase after brimonidine treatment (P = 0.355). There was no significant change in pulse rate or blood pressure. Conclusions: Both latanoprost and brimonidine reduce IOP in NTG patients. Brimonidine has a peak IOP-lowering effect equal to that of latanoprost but produces a higher mean diurnal IOP than does latanoprost because of its shorter effect. Latanoprost might favorably alter optic disc blood perfusion by increasing OPP.
AB - Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of latanoprost 0.005% once daily and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% twice daily in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). Design: A randomized, open-label, crossover study. Participants: Twenty-eight NTG patients with progressive visual field defects/optic disc excavation, new disc hemorrhage, or field defects that threatened fixation. Intervention: Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were treated with latanoprost, lubricant, and brimonidine for 4 weeks each, whereas patients in group 2 were treated with brimonidine, lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each. Main Outcome Measures: Intraocular pressure (IOP), pulse rate, and blood pressure were measured at 8 am, 12 noon, and 4 pm after each 4-week treatment. Ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated. Results: Latanoprost and brimonidine reduced the average IOP by 3.6 ± 1.9 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 2.5 ± 1.3 mmHg (P <0.001), respectively, with a significant difference between the two regimens (P = 0.009). Both drugs significantly reduced IOP at each time point. Latanoprost decreased IOP significantly more than did brimonidine at 8 am (11.7 ± 2.2 mmHg vs. 13.7 ± 2.1 mmHg, P = 0.004) and 4 pm (11.4 ± 2.1 mmHg vs. 13.2 ± 2.9 mmHg, P = 0.004), but IOP was equal between the two agents at 12 noon (11.5 ± 2.6 mmHg vs. 11.5 ± 2.3 mmHg, P = 0.967). IOP was maintained at 12 mmHg or lower in 18 (66.7%) of 27 patients after treatment with latanoprost and in 9 (33.3%) of 27 patients after treatment with brimonidine. Latanoprost monotherapy reduced IOP by 30% in 8 patients (29.6%), but brimonidine monotherapy did not reduce IOP by that much in any of the patients. OPP increased after latanoprost treatment (P < 0.001) but did not increase after brimonidine treatment (P = 0.355). There was no significant change in pulse rate or blood pressure. Conclusions: Both latanoprost and brimonidine reduce IOP in NTG patients. Brimonidine has a peak IOP-lowering effect equal to that of latanoprost but produces a higher mean diurnal IOP than does latanoprost because of its shorter effect. Latanoprost might favorably alter optic disc blood perfusion by increasing OPP.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036896349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01247-2
DO - 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01247-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 12466165
AN - SCOPUS:0036896349
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 109
SP - 2241
EP - 2247
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 12
ER -