TY - GEN
T1 - Assessing life cycle environmental implications of polymer nanocomposites
AU - Khanna, Vikas
AU - Bakshi, Bhavik R.
AU - Lee, L. James
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Research into the holistic evaluation of emerging nanotechnologies using systems analysis is pivotal for guiding their safe and sustainable development. This work presents the first energetic life cycle assessment of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) that evaluates both thermoplastic and thermoset resins. Both simple carbon nanofiber (CNF) and carbon nanofiber-glass fiber (CNF-GF) hybrid nanocomposites are evaluated and compared with steel. The issue of life cycle inventory is tackled based on published literature and best available engineering information. A cradle-to-gate comparison reveals that CNF reinforced PNCs are 1.3-10 times more energy intensive than steel and thus the product use phase is likely to govern whether any net savings in life cycle energy consumption can be realized for PNC based products. A case study involving the use of CNF and CNF-GF reinforced PNCs in the body panels of automobiles is further presented and highlights that the use of PNCs with lower CNF loading ratios may result in net life cycle fossil energy savings relative to steel. Other factors such as cost, toxicity impact of CNF, and end-of-life issues specific to CNFs need to be considered to evaluate the final economic and environmental performance of CNF reinforced PNC materials. The results of this study can easily be used for evaluating other CNF based PNC applications.
AB - Research into the holistic evaluation of emerging nanotechnologies using systems analysis is pivotal for guiding their safe and sustainable development. This work presents the first energetic life cycle assessment of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) that evaluates both thermoplastic and thermoset resins. Both simple carbon nanofiber (CNF) and carbon nanofiber-glass fiber (CNF-GF) hybrid nanocomposites are evaluated and compared with steel. The issue of life cycle inventory is tackled based on published literature and best available engineering information. A cradle-to-gate comparison reveals that CNF reinforced PNCs are 1.3-10 times more energy intensive than steel and thus the product use phase is likely to govern whether any net savings in life cycle energy consumption can be realized for PNC based products. A case study involving the use of CNF and CNF-GF reinforced PNCs in the body panels of automobiles is further presented and highlights that the use of PNCs with lower CNF loading ratios may result in net life cycle fossil energy savings relative to steel. Other factors such as cost, toxicity impact of CNF, and end-of-life issues specific to CNFs need to be considered to evaluate the final economic and environmental performance of CNF reinforced PNC materials. The results of this study can easily be used for evaluating other CNF based PNC applications.
KW - Carbon nanofiber (CNF)
KW - Glass fiber (GF)
KW - Life cycle assessment (LCA)
KW - Unsaturated polyester resin (UPR)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51849102552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISEE.2008.4562903
DO - 10.1109/ISEE.2008.4562903
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:51849102552
SN - 1424422728
SN - 9781424422722
T3 - IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment
BT - 2008 16th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, ISEE
T2 - 2008 16th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, ISEE
Y2 - 19 May 2008 through 22 May 2008
ER -