TY - JOUR
T1 - A foundational framework for high-intensity interval training in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Yang, Fu An
AU - Lee, Hsuei Chen
AU - Chi, Ting Wei
AU - Chen, Wei Di
AU - Chu, Yi Ching
AU - Huang, Chao Chun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to synthesize the evidence into a Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type framework for clinical application. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) within the Cochrane Library through 14 July 2025. Trials evaluating structured high-intensity interval training programs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Results: Sixteen trials were included, with data from 11 pooled for meta-analysis. Compared to moderate-intensity continuous training, high-intensity interval training significantly improved walking distance, peak workload, and quality of life. High-intensity interval training combined with resistance training also yielded greater improvements in exercise capacity than usual care. No serious adverse events were directly attributed to the training. Conclusions: High-intensity interval training is a safe and superior strategy compared to continuous training for enhancing outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This review successfully translates these findings into a practical Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type framework, providing a scientific model to standardize clinical practice and guide future research.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to synthesize the evidence into a Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type framework for clinical application. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) within the Cochrane Library through 14 July 2025. Trials evaluating structured high-intensity interval training programs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Results: Sixteen trials were included, with data from 11 pooled for meta-analysis. Compared to moderate-intensity continuous training, high-intensity interval training significantly improved walking distance, peak workload, and quality of life. High-intensity interval training combined with resistance training also yielded greater improvements in exercise capacity than usual care. No serious adverse events were directly attributed to the training. Conclusions: High-intensity interval training is a safe and superior strategy compared to continuous training for enhancing outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This review successfully translates these findings into a practical Frequency, Intensity, Time, and Type framework, providing a scientific model to standardize clinical practice and guide future research.
KW - Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
KW - exercise capacity
KW - high-intensity interval training
KW - meta-analysis
KW - systematic review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105029353695
U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2026.2617083
DO - 10.1080/09638288.2026.2617083
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105029353695
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 48
SP - 5082
EP - 5101
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 16
ER -