Three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: A 3-year follow-up study

Yi Wen Yang, Sheng Chieh Huang, Shih Ching Chang, Huann Sheng Wang, Shung Haur Yang, Wei Shone Chen, Yuan Tzu Lan, Chun Chi Lin, Hung Hsin Lin, Jeng Kai Jiang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Background: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy was developed to overcome the drawbacks of two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy, namely lack of depth perception. However, the benefit of 3D laparoscopy in colorectal surgery is inconclusive. Here, we compare the 3-year follow-up outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic colectomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 91 consecutive patients who underwent either 3D or 2D laparoscopy colectomy from October 2015 to November 2017 by a single surgical team for colon cancer were enrolled. Data were collected from a prospectively constructed database, including clinico-pathological features and operative parameters. The pathological results, recurrence, survival and systemic treatment were collected from the Taiwan Cancer Database. Results: There were 47 patients in the 3D group and 44 in the 2D group. There were no significant differences in characteristics of patients, operation data, pathological results, complications, operative time, blood loss or the number of lymph node harvested between the two groups. In addition, disease-free survival and overall survival were equal between the two groups. Conclusions: This is the first long-term result of a 3D laparoscopic colectomy. In our 3-year follow-up, there was no difference in long-term outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopy for colorectal surgery in an experienced centre.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-294
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Minimal Access Surgery
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2022


  • Colectomy
  • colonic neoplasms
  • imaging
  • laparoscopy
  • three-dimensional


Dive into the research topics of 'Three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: A 3-year follow-up study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this