Strategic Nonresponse: The Mediating Role of Buyer Engagement

Jin-Su Kang*, Stephen Downing, Gideon Markman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

Competitive dynamics research explains why and how rivals attack each other, but it only implicitly captures how buyer engagement influences attacker-target relations. This potential oversimplification of the buyer’s influence is further exacerbated by another problem: An overwhelming majority of targets do not react to attacks against them (Chen & MacMillan, 1992). Introducing a demand-side approach to competitive dynamics, this conceptual study evinces that buyer engagement subsequent to an attack and the nonresponse decision of targets are quite interrelated; when attacks resonate with and harness strong buyer engagement, targets retaliate; when attacks leave buyers unaffected, targets remain unmoved. Our analytical simulations indicate that buyer engagement plays a consequential role in attacker-target relations, resulting in conditions for nonresponse that may be asymmetrical to those motivating response.
Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - 2019
EventStrategic Management Society 39th Annual Conference - Minneapolis, Minneapolis, United States
Duration: 19 Oct 201922 Oct 2019

Conference

ConferenceStrategic Management Society 39th Annual Conference
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityMinneapolis
Period19/10/1922/10/19

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategic Nonresponse: The Mediating Role of Buyer Engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this