Recommendations and guidelines for endoscope reprocessing: Current position statement of digestive endoscopic society of Taiwan

Wei Kuo Chang, Chen Ling Peng, Yen Wei Chen, Cheuk Kay Sun, Chieh Chang Chen, Tao Chieh Liu, Yin Yi Chu, I. Fang Tsai, Chen Shuan Chung, Hsiao Fen Lin, Fang Yu Hsu, Wei Chen Tai, Hsi Chang Lee, Hsu Heng Yen, E. Ming Wang, Shu Hui Chen, Cheng Hsin Chu, Ming Jen Chen, Ching Liang Lu, Cheng Tang Chiu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Reprocessing of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes and accessories is an essential part of patient safety and quality control in GI endoscopy centers. However, current endoscopic reprocessing guidelines or procedures are not adequate to ensure patient-safe endoscopy. Approximately 5.4 % of the clinically used duodenoscopes remain contaminated with high-concern microorganisms. Thus, the Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan (DEST) sets standards for the reprocessing of GI endoscopes and accessories in endoscopy centers. DEST organized a task force working group using the guideline-revision process. These guidelines contain principles and instructions of step-by-step for endoscope reprocessing. The updated guidelines were established after a thorough review of the existing global and local guidelines, systematic reviews, and health technology assessments of clinical effectiveness. This guideline aims to provide detailed recommendations for endoscope reprocessing to ensure adequate quality control in endoscopy centers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-224
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Disinfection
  • Endoscope reprocessing
  • Endoscopy
  • Guidelines
  • Sterilization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations and guidelines for endoscope reprocessing: Current position statement of digestive endoscopic society of Taiwan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this