TY - JOUR
T1 - Prophylactic antibiotic reduces the risk of peritonitis after invasive gynecologic procedures
AU - Fan, Pei Yi
AU - Chan, Ming Jen
AU - Lin, Sheng Hsuan
AU - Wu, Hsin Hsu
AU - Chang, Ming Yang
AU - Tian, Ya Chung
AU - Kuo, George
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Background: Peritonitis is a serious complication after invasive procedures in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Most studies that have investigated peritonitis following invasive gynecologic procedures enrolled small patient populations. This study focuses on the clinical presentation, outcomes, and effects of prophylactic antibiotic use before invasive techniques. ♦ Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent invasive gynecologic procedures between 2005 and 2015 in a tertiary medical center. Eligible patients were identified and enrolled and their demographic data were collected. The use of prophylactic antibiotics and the outcomes of peritonitis were recorded. ♦ Results: Twenty-six gynecologic procedures were performed on 18 PD patients. Seven episodes of peritonitis occurred in 6 patients after invasive gynecologic procedures. Eleven procedures were preceded by prophylactic antibiotic treatment (6 oral cefadroxil, 1 oral cefuroxime, 1 oral clindamycin, 1 intravenous [IV] ceftriaxone, 1 IV ceftazidime, and 1 IV cefazolin). The pathogens were diverse (group B Streptococcus, group D Streptococcus, E. coli, and Enterococcus). All episodes of peritonitis were successfully treated using intraperitoneal antibiotics without recurrence, technique failure, or mortality. The odds ratio of peritonitis in the non-prophylaxis group was 20.29 (95% confidence interval 1.01 – 406.35, p = 0.0103). ♦ Conclusion: The use of prophylactic antibiotic treatment considerably reduced the risk of peritonitis after invasive gynecologic procedures.
AB - Background: Peritonitis is a serious complication after invasive procedures in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Most studies that have investigated peritonitis following invasive gynecologic procedures enrolled small patient populations. This study focuses on the clinical presentation, outcomes, and effects of prophylactic antibiotic use before invasive techniques. ♦ Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent invasive gynecologic procedures between 2005 and 2015 in a tertiary medical center. Eligible patients were identified and enrolled and their demographic data were collected. The use of prophylactic antibiotics and the outcomes of peritonitis were recorded. ♦ Results: Twenty-six gynecologic procedures were performed on 18 PD patients. Seven episodes of peritonitis occurred in 6 patients after invasive gynecologic procedures. Eleven procedures were preceded by prophylactic antibiotic treatment (6 oral cefadroxil, 1 oral cefuroxime, 1 oral clindamycin, 1 intravenous [IV] ceftriaxone, 1 IV ceftazidime, and 1 IV cefazolin). The pathogens were diverse (group B Streptococcus, group D Streptococcus, E. coli, and Enterococcus). All episodes of peritonitis were successfully treated using intraperitoneal antibiotics without recurrence, technique failure, or mortality. The odds ratio of peritonitis in the non-prophylaxis group was 20.29 (95% confidence interval 1.01 – 406.35, p = 0.0103). ♦ Conclusion: The use of prophylactic antibiotic treatment considerably reduced the risk of peritonitis after invasive gynecologic procedures.
KW - antibiotic prophylaxis
KW - hysteroscopy
KW - Peritoneal dialysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069798166&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3747/pdi.2018.00218
DO - 10.3747/pdi.2018.00218
M3 - Article
C2 - 31028109
AN - SCOPUS:85069798166
SN - 0896-8608
VL - 39
SP - 356
EP - 361
JO - Peritoneal Dialysis International
JF - Peritoneal Dialysis International
IS - 4
ER -