TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and association of refractive anisometropia with near work habits among young schoolchildren
T2 - The evidence from a population-based study
AU - Lee, Chia Wei
AU - Fang, Shao You
AU - Tsai, Der Chong
AU - Huang, Nicole
AU - Hsu, Chih Chien
AU - Chen, Shing Yi
AU - Chiu, Allen Wen Hsiang
AU - Liu, Catherine Jui Ling
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Background Lifestyle behaviour may play a role in refractive error among children, but the association between near work habits and refractive anisometropia remains unclear. Methods We estimated the prevalence of refractive anisometropia and examined its association with near work activities among 23,114 children in the Myopia Investigation Study in Taipei who were grade 2 elementary school students at baseline in 2013 and 2014. Baseline data on demographics, medical history, parental history and near work habits were collected by parent-administered questionnaire survey. Refractive status was determined by cycloplegic autorefraction. Refractive anisometropia was defined as the spherical equivalent difference ô 1.0 diopter between eyes. Results The prevalence of refractive anisometropia was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0% to 5.6%). The prevalence and severity of refractive anisometropia increased with both myopic and hyperopic refractive error. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that refractive anisometropia was significantly associated with myopia (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; 95% CI, 2.53-3.51), hyperopia (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.98-2.83), degree of astigmatism (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.005-1.006), amblyopia (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.06-3.12), male gender (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99) and senior high school level of maternal education (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.92). Though anisometropic children were more likely to spend more time on near work (crude OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29) and to have less eye-to-object distance in doing near work (crude OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30), these associations became insignificant after additional adjustment for ocular, demographic and parental factors. Conclusions The present study provides large-scale, population-based evidence showing no independent association between refractive anisometropia and near work habits, though myopia is associated with refractive anisometropia.
AB - Background Lifestyle behaviour may play a role in refractive error among children, but the association between near work habits and refractive anisometropia remains unclear. Methods We estimated the prevalence of refractive anisometropia and examined its association with near work activities among 23,114 children in the Myopia Investigation Study in Taipei who were grade 2 elementary school students at baseline in 2013 and 2014. Baseline data on demographics, medical history, parental history and near work habits were collected by parent-administered questionnaire survey. Refractive status was determined by cycloplegic autorefraction. Refractive anisometropia was defined as the spherical equivalent difference ô 1.0 diopter between eyes. Results The prevalence of refractive anisometropia was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0% to 5.6%). The prevalence and severity of refractive anisometropia increased with both myopic and hyperopic refractive error. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that refractive anisometropia was significantly associated with myopia (odds ratio [OR], 2.98; 95% CI, 2.53-3.51), hyperopia (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.98-2.83), degree of astigmatism (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.005-1.006), amblyopia (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 2.06-3.12), male gender (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99) and senior high school level of maternal education (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.92). Though anisometropic children were more likely to spend more time on near work (crude OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29) and to have less eye-to-object distance in doing near work (crude OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30), these associations became insignificant after additional adjustment for ocular, demographic and parental factors. Conclusions The present study provides large-scale, population-based evidence showing no independent association between refractive anisometropia and near work habits, though myopia is associated with refractive anisometropia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014859626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173519
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173519
M3 - Article
C2 - 28273153
AN - SCOPUS:85014859626
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 3
M1 - e0173519
ER -