Abstract
A new priority management policy, a prescheduling policy, is proposed. This policy can be applied on any conventional concurrency control protocol to schedule a real-time transaction. Costly preemption is avoided by the prescheduling policy, and parsing dataset of a transaction is not needed. Three widely used conventional concurrency control protocols (dynamic two-phase locking, basic timestamp ordering, and optimistic) are incorporated with the prescheduling policy to form three real-time concurrency control protocols. Performance of the three protocols is evaluated from three different viewpoints: database management systems, protocols, and transaction. From a database management system viewpoint, we show the prescheduling policy can improve the performance of protocols by raising the valid ratio and reducing restart counts. In general, two-phase locking with the prescheduling policy performs the best in most cases and yields the best choice for concurrency control in a real-time application. Deciding factors that affect performance of each protocol are identified from protocol viewpoint. Some suggestions are given for writing a timely transaction from the aspect of transaction viewpoint.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 23-42 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Systems Integration |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Mar 1993 |
Keywords
- concurrency control
- performance evaluation
- prescheduling
- Real-time
- valid ratio