Nursing students’ perceptions of menstrual distress during clinical practice: A Q-methodology study

Ya Lin Fu, Chia Ling Yang, Shu Chuan Yu, Yun Hsuan Lin, Hsiao Pei Hsu, Chiu Mieh Huang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the cluster patterns of female nursing students’ perceptions of the effects of menstrual distress during clinical practice. This study adopted the Q-methodology study design. We recruited female nursing students from a college in northern Taiwan. Forty-seven Q-statements were constructed to explore participants’ experiences of the impact of menstrual distress on clinical learning. In total, 58 participants subjectively ranked Q-statements concerning menstrual distress experiences during clinical practice and were classified. After Q-sorting, the subjective ranking process PQ Method (version 2.35, Schmolck, Emmendingen, Germany) was employed for factor analysis. Four patterns of shared perspectives, accounting for 46.6% of the total variance, were identified: (a) influencing clinical learning and making good use of painkillers; (b) responsible attitudes and diversified relief of discomfort; (c) seeking peer support and effect on mood; (d) negative impact on learning ability and conservative self-care. Clinical practice is a major component of nursing education; menstrual distress affects female nursing students’ clinical learning and performance. The exploration of clustering different nursing students’ perceptions may facilitate customized strategies to enable more appropriate assistance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3160
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical practice
  • Menstrual distress
  • Northern Taiwan
  • Nursing students
  • Q-methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nursing students’ perceptions of menstrual distress during clinical practice: A Q-methodology study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this