TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixed simulation course increases participants’ positive stress coping abilities
AU - Huang, Chia Chang
AU - Lee, Fa Yauh
AU - Yang, Ling Yu
AU - Yang, Ying Ying
AU - Chen, Chen Huan
AU - Liang, Jen Feng
AU - Cheng, Hao Min
AU - Huang, Chin Chou
AU - Hwang, Shinn Jang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Background Lack of health professional awareness of interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) often results in stress and conflicts between team members in the medical system. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mixed simulation-interprofessional education (IPE) courses to enhance coping strategies for IPCP-associated stress. Methods Participants (n = 54) from the disciplines of physicians (n = 12), nurses (n = 28) and pharmacists (n = 14) were enrolled. Over the course of the study period, all participants were asked to complete pre-course (T1), post-course (T2) and end-of-study (T3) questionnaires for self-assessment of perceived stress scale (PSS), stress coping preference scale (SCPS), and IPCP proficiency. Results Basically, physicians felt less IPCP-associated stress than did nurses and pharmacists. For physicians, nurses and pharmacists, the mean post-course (T2) PSS scores were significantly lower than pre-course (T1) PSS scores, which indicated decreased IPCP-associated stress after mixed simulation-IPE courses. In comparison with physicians, the greater difference (T2–T1 scores) in the PSS and positive coping SCPS subscales scores were noted among nurses and pharmacists. For nurses and pharmacists, the further improvements in stress coping abilities (PSS scale and positive SCPS subscale) were noted at the end-of-study self-assessment by comparison of post-course scores with end-of-study scores. For IPCP proficiency, all participants gave more positive responses to the specific questions in the end-of-study questionnaires. Conclusion Our study supports the use of mixed simulation-IPE courses as part of continuing education to enhance positive stress coping strategies.
AB - Background Lack of health professional awareness of interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) often results in stress and conflicts between team members in the medical system. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mixed simulation-interprofessional education (IPE) courses to enhance coping strategies for IPCP-associated stress. Methods Participants (n = 54) from the disciplines of physicians (n = 12), nurses (n = 28) and pharmacists (n = 14) were enrolled. Over the course of the study period, all participants were asked to complete pre-course (T1), post-course (T2) and end-of-study (T3) questionnaires for self-assessment of perceived stress scale (PSS), stress coping preference scale (SCPS), and IPCP proficiency. Results Basically, physicians felt less IPCP-associated stress than did nurses and pharmacists. For physicians, nurses and pharmacists, the mean post-course (T2) PSS scores were significantly lower than pre-course (T1) PSS scores, which indicated decreased IPCP-associated stress after mixed simulation-IPE courses. In comparison with physicians, the greater difference (T2–T1 scores) in the PSS and positive coping SCPS subscales scores were noted among nurses and pharmacists. For nurses and pharmacists, the further improvements in stress coping abilities (PSS scale and positive SCPS subscale) were noted at the end-of-study self-assessment by comparison of post-course scores with end-of-study scores. For IPCP proficiency, all participants gave more positive responses to the specific questions in the end-of-study questionnaires. Conclusion Our study supports the use of mixed simulation-IPE courses as part of continuing education to enhance positive stress coping strategies.
KW - Interprofessional collaborative practice
KW - Interprofessional education
KW - Mixed simulation course
KW - Positive stress coping strategies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033213932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.07.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.07.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 29122538
AN - SCOPUS:85033213932
SN - 1726-4901
VL - 81
SP - 58
EP - 63
JO - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
IS - 1
ER -