Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: Noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method

Hao Min Cheng, Shih Hsien Sung, Yuan Ta Shih, Shao Yuan Chuang, Wen Chung Yu, Chen Huan Chen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe prognostic value of central aortic pulse pressure (PP-C) may have been underestimated due to its measurement inaccuracy. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation of PP-C by a generalized transfer function (GTF) or a novel pulse wave analysis (PWA) approach to directly estimate PP-C.MethodsInvasive high-fidelity right brachial and central aortic pressure tracings, and left brachial pulse volume plethysmography (PVP) waveforms from an oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor were all digitized simultaneously in 40 patients during cardiac catheterization. An aortic-to-brachial GTF and a PWA multivariate prediction model using the PVP waveforms calibrated to brachial cuff systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP(DBP) were constructed. Accuracy of the two methods was examined in another 100 patients against invasively measured PP-C.ResultsThe error of cuff PP in estimating PP-C was 1.8 ± 12.4 mm Hg. Application of the GTF on noninvasively calibrated PVP waveforms produced reconstructed aortic pressure waves and PP-C estimates with errors of 3.4 ± 11.6 mm Hg (PP-C = reconstructed aortic SBP aortic DBP) and 2.3 ± 11.4 mm Hg (PP-C = reconstructed aortic SBP cuff DBP), respectively. The observed systematic errors were proportional to the magnitudes of PP-C. In contrast, the error of the PWA prediction model was 3.0 ± 7.1 mm Hg without obvious proportional systematic error.ConclusionsLarge random and systematic errors are introduced into the PP-C estimates when PP-C is calculated as the difference between the estimated central SBP and central or cuff DBP. The accuracy can be improved substantially with the novel PWA approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1162-1169
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Hypertension
Volume25
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Keywords

  • blood pressure
  • central pulse pressure
  • hypertension
  • oscillometric signals
  • pressure wave reflection
  • pulse volume plethysmography
  • pulse wave analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: Noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this