TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving segmentation reliability of multi-scanner brain images using a generative adversarial network
AU - Niu, Kai
AU - Li, Xueyan
AU - Zhang, Li
AU - Yan, Zhensong
AU - Yu, Wei
AU - Liang, Peipeng
AU - Wang, Yan
AU - Lin, Ching Po
AU - Zhang, Huimao
AU - Guo, Chunjie
AU - Li, Kuncheng
AU - Qian, Tianyi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: Magnetic resonance (MR) images generated by different scanners generally have inconsistent contrast properties, making it difficult to perform a combined quantitative analysis of images from a range of scanners. In this study, we aimed to develop an automatic brain image segmentation model to provide a more reliable analysis of MR images taken with different scanners. Methods: The spatially localized atlas network tiles-27 (SLANT-27) deep learning model was used to train the automatic segmentation module, based on a multi-center dataset of 1,917 three-dimensional (3D) T1- weighted MR images. Subsequently, a framework called Qbrain, consisting of a new generative adversarial network (GAN) image transfer module and the SLANT-27 segmentation module, was developed. Another 3D T1-weighted MRI interscan dataset of 48 participants who were scanned in 3 MRI scanners (1.5T Siemens Avanto, 3T Siemens Trio Tim, and 3T Philips Ingenia) on the same day was used to train and test the Qbrain model. Volumetric T1-weighted images were processed with Qbrain, SLANT-27, and FreeSurfer (FS). The automatic segmentation reliability across the scanners was assessed using test-retest variability (TRV). Results: The reproducibility of different segmentation methods across scanners showed a consistent trend in the greater reliability and robustness of QBrain compared to SLANT-27 which, in turn, showed greater reliability and robustness compared to FS. Furthermore, when the GAN image transfer module was added, the mean segmentation error of the TRV of the 3T Siemens vs. 1.5T Siemens, the 3T Philips vs. 1.5T Siemens, and the 3T Siemens vs. 3T Philips scanners was reduced by 1.57%, 2.01%, and 0.56%, respectively. In addition, the segmentation model improved intra-scanner variability (0.9-1.67%) compared with that of FS (2.47-4.32%). Conclusions: The newly developed QBrain method combined with GAN image transfer module and a SLANT-27 segmentation module was shown to improve the reliability of whole-brain automatic structural segmentation results across multiple scanners, thus representing a suitable alternative quantitative method of comparative brain tissue analysis for individual patients.
AB - Background: Magnetic resonance (MR) images generated by different scanners generally have inconsistent contrast properties, making it difficult to perform a combined quantitative analysis of images from a range of scanners. In this study, we aimed to develop an automatic brain image segmentation model to provide a more reliable analysis of MR images taken with different scanners. Methods: The spatially localized atlas network tiles-27 (SLANT-27) deep learning model was used to train the automatic segmentation module, based on a multi-center dataset of 1,917 three-dimensional (3D) T1- weighted MR images. Subsequently, a framework called Qbrain, consisting of a new generative adversarial network (GAN) image transfer module and the SLANT-27 segmentation module, was developed. Another 3D T1-weighted MRI interscan dataset of 48 participants who were scanned in 3 MRI scanners (1.5T Siemens Avanto, 3T Siemens Trio Tim, and 3T Philips Ingenia) on the same day was used to train and test the Qbrain model. Volumetric T1-weighted images were processed with Qbrain, SLANT-27, and FreeSurfer (FS). The automatic segmentation reliability across the scanners was assessed using test-retest variability (TRV). Results: The reproducibility of different segmentation methods across scanners showed a consistent trend in the greater reliability and robustness of QBrain compared to SLANT-27 which, in turn, showed greater reliability and robustness compared to FS. Furthermore, when the GAN image transfer module was added, the mean segmentation error of the TRV of the 3T Siemens vs. 1.5T Siemens, the 3T Philips vs. 1.5T Siemens, and the 3T Siemens vs. 3T Philips scanners was reduced by 1.57%, 2.01%, and 0.56%, respectively. In addition, the segmentation model improved intra-scanner variability (0.9-1.67%) compared with that of FS (2.47-4.32%). Conclusions: The newly developed QBrain method combined with GAN image transfer module and a SLANT-27 segmentation module was shown to improve the reliability of whole-brain automatic structural segmentation results across multiple scanners, thus representing a suitable alternative quantitative method of comparative brain tissue analysis for individual patients.
KW - Brain, segmentation
KW - Deep learning
KW - Generative adversarial network (GAN)
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122861703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21037/qims-21-653
DO - 10.21037/qims-21-653
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122861703
SN - 2223-4292
VL - 12
SP - 1775
EP - 1786
JO - Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
JF - Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
IS - 3
ER -