Experience with the use of free fasciocutaneous flap in through-and-through cheek-buccal defect reconstruction surgical outcome and quality of life analysis

Chih Hsun Lin, Yen Hao Chiu, Cherng Kang Perng, Wen Chieh Liao, Hsu Ma*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Through-and-through cheek-buccal soft tissue defects usually require fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction. However, no ideal flap has been established for reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective chart review of head and neck reconstruction performed at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2003 and 2012 was conducted. Surgical outcomes and quality-of-life assessments between different fasciocutaneous flaps were collected and compared. Results: Eighty-five patients received a free anterolateral thigh flap, and 25 patients received a free forearm flap. The flap success rates were 96.4% for the free anterolateral thigh flap and 96% for the free forearm flap. Appearance, swallowing, and speech were less satisfactory in long-term follow-up; and recurrent tumor, flap size (>100 cm2), oral commissure involvement, and long hospital stay (>40 days) were associated with unsatisfactory quality of life. Conclusions: Free fasciocutaneous flap can result in acceptable success rates, but patient satisfaction with appearing, swallowing, and speech function was relatively lowafter reconstruction. Tumor status (primary or recurrent), flap size, oral commissure involvement, and length of hospital stay are the main factors that affect quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S74-S79
JournalAnnals of plastic surgery
Volume76
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Alt flap
  • Cheek reconstruction
  • Forearm flap
  • Free flap
  • Quality of life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experience with the use of free fasciocutaneous flap in through-and-through cheek-buccal defect reconstruction surgical outcome and quality of life analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this