Empirical Risk Minimization With Relative Entropy Regularization

Samir M. Perlaza*, Gaetan Bisson, Iñaki Esnaola, Alain Jean-Marie, Stefano Rini

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

The empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem with relative entropy regularization (ERM-RER) is investigated under the assumption that the reference measure is a σ-finite measure, and not necessarily a probability measure. Under this assumption, which leads to a generalization of the ERM-RER problem allowing a larger degree of flexibility for incorporating prior knowledge, numerous relevant properties are stated. Among these properties, the solution to this problem, if it exists, is shown to be a unique probability measure, mutually absolutely continuous with the reference measure. Such a solution exhibits a probably-approximately-correct guarantee for the ERM problem independently of whether the latter possesses a solution. For a fixed dataset and under a specific condition, the empirical risk is shown to be a sub-Gaussian random variable when the models are sampled from the solution to the ERM-RER problem. The generalization capabilities of the solution to the ERM-RER problem (the Gibbs algorithm) are studied via the sensitivity of the expected empirical risk to deviations from such a solution towards alternative probability measures. Finally, an interesting connection between sensitivity, generalization error, and lautum information is established.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10433697
Pages (from-to)5122-5161
Number of pages40
JournalIEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Volume70
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • PAC-learning
  • Supervised learning
  • empirical risk minimization
  • generalization
  • gibbs algorithm
  • gibbs measure
  • relative entropy regularization
  • sensitivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Empirical Risk Minimization With Relative Entropy Regularization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this