Abstract
In the proof of Proposition A.2 of Appendix in our published paper [1], we used the continuity of the normal derivative of q(x) at @G. This is not true because q(x) is not a double layer potential. A correct proof can be given as follows: Let R(') = 0 with ' 2 H 1=2(@G). Then z = S['] satisfies (Formula Presented). By the unique continuation property of solutions of the Laplace equation, we have S['] = z = 0 on @G. Then by the bijectivity of S : H-1,2(@G) ! H-1,2(@G) given in Proposition A.1, we have ' = 0, which proves the injectivity of R.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 907 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Inverse Problems and Imaging |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Aug 2023 |