Comparison of the outcomes of anterolateral thigh flap and peroneal flap in total laryngectomy reconstruction

Yu Hsuan Hsieh*, I. Wen Chen, Cheng Ta Lin, Kuo Chung Yang, Wen Chung Liu, Ching Ching Chiu, Shih Yu Lee, Lee Wei Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: We usually use an ALT or peroneal flap in total laryngectomy reconstruction, depending on the surgeons' preference. No direct comparison of the outcomes of the ALT flap and peroneal flap exists. Methods: From 2014 to 2022, we reviewed patients who had total laryngectomy and were reconstructed with an ALT flap and peroneal flap. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected and compared. Results: The peroneal group had a significantly higher risk of neopharynx leakage (40% vs. 13.2%, p =.020) and late pharyngocutaneous fistula formation (30% vs. 5.3%, p =.009) than the ALT group. Peroneal flap was found to be the only independent risk factor for neopharynx leakage (p =.025, odds ratio [OR] = 5.5) and late pharyngocutaneous fistula formation (p =.02, OR = 7.7) in multivariate logistic regression. Conclusion: In the reconstruction of total laryngectomy, the ALT flap is preferable over the peroneal flap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-650
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • cancer
  • laryngectomy
  • peroneal flap
  • pharyngoesophageal
  • reconstruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the outcomes of anterolateral thigh flap and peroneal flap in total laryngectomy reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this