TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the effects of simulation training and problem-based scenarios on the improvement of graduating nursing students to speak up about medication errors
T2 - A quasi-experimental study
AU - Kuo, Shu Yu
AU - Wu, Jen Chieh
AU - Chen, Hui Wen
AU - Chen, Chia Jung
AU - Hu, Sophia H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Background: Medication administration errors are common among new nurses. Nursing students might be less willing to speak up about errors because of a lack of knowledge and experience. Objectives: To examine the effects of simulation training and problem-based scenarios on speaking up about medication errors among graduating nursing students. Design: Prospective, controlled experimental study design. Setting: A university four-year nursing program in Taiwan. Participants: In total, 93 graduating nursing students in their last semester were recruited. Sixty-six students who received both a problem-based scenario and medication administration simulation training comprised the experimental group, while 27 students who received problem-based scenarios alone comprised the control group. Methods: Experimental group students underwent 2 h of simulation training. This training class was designed based on Kolb's experiential learning theory for knowledge development and speaking up about errors. Students in both groups administered medications in problem-based scenarios with eight embedded errors. Students' performance in speaking up about medication errors was directly observed and graded using an objective structured checklist. The McNeamer Chi-squared test, paired t-test, Z test, t-test, and Hedges' g effect size were conducted. Results: The number of times participants spoke up about medication errors significantly improved in both the experimental group (pre-test: 2.05 ± 1.12 and post-test 6.14 ± 1.25, t = 22.85, p<0.001) and control group (pretest: 2.04 ± 1.16 and post-test: 4.26 ± 1.63, t = 6.33, p<0.001). However, after the intervention, the mean number of times participants spoke up about medication errors in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t = 5.99, p<0.001) in the post-test. Conclusions: Simulation training exhibited more-significant improvements than problem-based scenarios. Nursing schools and hospitals should incorporate simulation training or at least problem-based scenarios to improve medication safety.
AB - Background: Medication administration errors are common among new nurses. Nursing students might be less willing to speak up about errors because of a lack of knowledge and experience. Objectives: To examine the effects of simulation training and problem-based scenarios on speaking up about medication errors among graduating nursing students. Design: Prospective, controlled experimental study design. Setting: A university four-year nursing program in Taiwan. Participants: In total, 93 graduating nursing students in their last semester were recruited. Sixty-six students who received both a problem-based scenario and medication administration simulation training comprised the experimental group, while 27 students who received problem-based scenarios alone comprised the control group. Methods: Experimental group students underwent 2 h of simulation training. This training class was designed based on Kolb's experiential learning theory for knowledge development and speaking up about errors. Students in both groups administered medications in problem-based scenarios with eight embedded errors. Students' performance in speaking up about medication errors was directly observed and graded using an objective structured checklist. The McNeamer Chi-squared test, paired t-test, Z test, t-test, and Hedges' g effect size were conducted. Results: The number of times participants spoke up about medication errors significantly improved in both the experimental group (pre-test: 2.05 ± 1.12 and post-test 6.14 ± 1.25, t = 22.85, p<0.001) and control group (pretest: 2.04 ± 1.16 and post-test: 4.26 ± 1.63, t = 6.33, p<0.001). However, after the intervention, the mean number of times participants spoke up about medication errors in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t = 5.99, p<0.001) in the post-test. Conclusions: Simulation training exhibited more-significant improvements than problem-based scenarios. Nursing schools and hospitals should incorporate simulation training or at least problem-based scenarios to improve medication safety.
KW - Clinical competence
KW - Medication errors
KW - Nursing student
KW - Simulation training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079164216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104359
DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104359
M3 - Article
C2 - 32058883
AN - SCOPUS:85079164216
SN - 0260-6917
VL - 87
JO - Nurse Education Today
JF - Nurse Education Today
M1 - 104359
ER -