TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Orthogonal Search and Canonical Variate Analysis for the Identification of Neurobiological Systems
AU - Wu, Yu Te
AU - Sun, Mingui
AU - Krieger, Don
AU - Sclabassi, Robert J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Grants from NIMH (MH00343), ONR (N000147-87-K-0472), and the AFOSR (89-1097). The authors would like to extend their thanks to the anonymous reviewers who, through their detailed suggestions and comments, have improved the quality and presentation of this paper.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - In this paper, we investigate two general methods of modeling and prediction which have been applied to neurobiological systems, the orthogonal search (OS) method and the canonical variate analysis (CVA) approach. In these methods, nonlinear autoregressive moving average with observed inputs (ARX) and state affine models are developed as one step predictors by minimizing the mean-squared-error. An unknown nonlinear time-invariant system is assumed to have the Markov property of finite order so that the one step predictors are finite dimensional. No special assumptions are made about model terms, model order or state dimensions. Three examples are presented. The first is a numerical example which demonstrates the differences between the two methods, while the last two examples are computer simulations for a bilinear system and the Lorenz attractor which can serve as a model for the EEG. These two methods produce comparable results in terms of minimizing the mean-square-error; however, the OS method produces an ARX model with fewer terms, while the CVA method produces a state model with fewer state dimensions.
AB - In this paper, we investigate two general methods of modeling and prediction which have been applied to neurobiological systems, the orthogonal search (OS) method and the canonical variate analysis (CVA) approach. In these methods, nonlinear autoregressive moving average with observed inputs (ARX) and state affine models are developed as one step predictors by minimizing the mean-squared-error. An unknown nonlinear time-invariant system is assumed to have the Markov property of finite order so that the one step predictors are finite dimensional. No special assumptions are made about model terms, model order or state dimensions. Three examples are presented. The first is a numerical example which demonstrates the differences between the two methods, while the last two examples are computer simulations for a bilinear system and the Lorenz attractor which can serve as a model for the EEG. These two methods produce comparable results in terms of minimizing the mean-square-error; however, the OS method produces an ARX model with fewer terms, while the CVA method produces a state model with fewer state dimensions.
KW - Canonical variate analysis
KW - Nonlinear autoregressive moving average
KW - Orthogonal search method
KW - State affine model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033197131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1114/1.213
DO - 10.1114/1.213
M3 - Article
C2 - 10548329
AN - SCOPUS:0033197131
SN - 0090-6964
VL - 27
SP - 592
EP - 606
JO - Annals of Biomedical Engineering
JF - Annals of Biomedical Engineering
IS - 5
ER -