TY - JOUR
T1 - Altered brainstem–cortex activation and interaction in migraine patients
T2 - somatosensory evoked EEG responses with machine learning
AU - Hsiao, Fu Jung
AU - Chen, Wei Ta
AU - Liu, Hung Yu
AU - Wu, Yu Te
AU - Wang, Yen Feng
AU - Pan, Li Ling Hope
AU - Lai, Kuan Lin
AU - Chen, Shih Pin
AU - Coppola, Gianluca
AU - Wang, Shuu Jiun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: To gain a comprehensive understanding of the altered sensory processing in patients with migraine, in this study, we developed an electroencephalography (EEG) protocol for examining brainstem and cortical responses to sensory stimulation. Furthermore, machine learning techniques were employed to identify neural signatures from evoked brainstem–cortex activation and their interactions, facilitating the identification of the presence and subtype of migraine. Methods: This study analysed 1,000-epoch-averaged somatosensory evoked responses from 342 participants, comprising 113 healthy controls (HCs), 106 patients with chronic migraine (CM), and 123 patients with episodic migraine (EM). Activation amplitude and effective connectivity were obtained using weighted minimum norm estimates with spectral Granger causality analysis. This study used support vector machine algorithms to develop classification models; multimodal data (amplitude, connectivity, and scores of psychometric assessments) were applied to assess the reliability and generalisability of the identification results from the classification models. Results: The findings revealed that patients with migraine exhibited reduced amplitudes for responses in both the brainstem and cortical regions and increased effective connectivity between these regions in the gamma and high-gamma frequency bands. The classification model with characteristic features performed well in distinguishing patients with CM from HCs, achieving an accuracy of 81.8% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 during training and an accuracy of 76.2% and an AUC of 0.89 during independent testing. Similarly, the model effectively identified patients with EM, with an accuracy of 77.5% and an AUC of 0.84 during training and an accuracy of 87% and an AUC of 0.88 during independent testing. Additionally, the model successfully differentiated patients with CM from patients with EM, with an accuracy of 70.5% and an AUC of 0.73 during training and an accuracy of 72.7% and an AUC of 0.74 during independent testing. Conclusion: Altered brainstem-cortex activation and interaction are characteristic of the abnormal sensory processing in migraine. Combining evoked activity analysis with machine learning offers a reliable and generalisable tool for identifying patients with migraine and for assessing the severity of their condition. Thus, this approach is an effective and rapid diagnostic tool for clinicians.
AB - Background: To gain a comprehensive understanding of the altered sensory processing in patients with migraine, in this study, we developed an electroencephalography (EEG) protocol for examining brainstem and cortical responses to sensory stimulation. Furthermore, machine learning techniques were employed to identify neural signatures from evoked brainstem–cortex activation and their interactions, facilitating the identification of the presence and subtype of migraine. Methods: This study analysed 1,000-epoch-averaged somatosensory evoked responses from 342 participants, comprising 113 healthy controls (HCs), 106 patients with chronic migraine (CM), and 123 patients with episodic migraine (EM). Activation amplitude and effective connectivity were obtained using weighted minimum norm estimates with spectral Granger causality analysis. This study used support vector machine algorithms to develop classification models; multimodal data (amplitude, connectivity, and scores of psychometric assessments) were applied to assess the reliability and generalisability of the identification results from the classification models. Results: The findings revealed that patients with migraine exhibited reduced amplitudes for responses in both the brainstem and cortical regions and increased effective connectivity between these regions in the gamma and high-gamma frequency bands. The classification model with characteristic features performed well in distinguishing patients with CM from HCs, achieving an accuracy of 81.8% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 during training and an accuracy of 76.2% and an AUC of 0.89 during independent testing. Similarly, the model effectively identified patients with EM, with an accuracy of 77.5% and an AUC of 0.84 during training and an accuracy of 87% and an AUC of 0.88 during independent testing. Additionally, the model successfully differentiated patients with CM from patients with EM, with an accuracy of 70.5% and an AUC of 0.73 during training and an accuracy of 72.7% and an AUC of 0.74 during independent testing. Conclusion: Altered brainstem-cortex activation and interaction are characteristic of the abnormal sensory processing in migraine. Combining evoked activity analysis with machine learning offers a reliable and generalisable tool for identifying patients with migraine and for assessing the severity of their condition. Thus, this approach is an effective and rapid diagnostic tool for clinicians.
KW - Brainstem
KW - EEG
KW - Insula
KW - Machine learning
KW - Migraine
KW - Primary motor cortex
KW - Primary somatosensory cortex
KW - Sensory processing
KW - Spectral Granger causality analysis
KW - Support vector machine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208082137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s10194-024-01892-2
DO - 10.1186/s10194-024-01892-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 39468471
AN - SCOPUS:85208082137
SN - 1129-2369
VL - 25
JO - Journal of Headache and Pain
JF - Journal of Headache and Pain
IS - 1
M1 - 185
ER -