A systemic review of taxanes and their side effects in metastatic breast cancer

Jiun I. Lai, Ta Chung Chao, Chun Yu Liu, Chi Cheng Huang, Ling Ming Tseng*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Taxanes-containing chemotherapy constitutes an essential backbone for both early and metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the two major taxane drugs—paclitaxel and docetaxel—have distinct safety profiles. In this review, we summarize the safety outcome and management following treatment with both taxanes from selected clinical trials. We utilized PubMed to perform literature search before April 2021. Five phase III randomized controlled trials with reports of individual taxane adverse events (AEs) were included in this review. Grade 3/4 AEs were summarized and discussed extensively. The rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia were higher with docetaxel than with paclitaxel. For non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs, peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with paclitaxel while fluid retention was more frequent with docetaxel. Compared to paclitaxel, docetaxel had a higher rate of grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AEs. Grade 3/4 myalgia were generally comparable between the two taxanes. Except for neutropenia, the incidence rate of grade 3/4 AEs of taxanes was generally manageable. Peripheral neuropathy was more common with paclitaxel while grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with docetaxel.

Original languageEnglish
Article number940239
JournalFrontiers in Oncology
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Oct 2022

Keywords

  • adverse event
  • breast cancer
  • docetaxel
  • paclitaxel
  • systemic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systemic review of taxanes and their side effects in metastatic breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this