Abstract
The United States’ indictment of United Microelectronics Corporation, Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Corporation, and three employees highlights the differences between the trade secret criminal law systems of Taiwan and the United States, including long-arm jurisdiction, criminal conspiracy, and the corporate criminal liability. Corporations unfamiliar with these differences are more likely to violate relevant criminal regulations and thus face serious legal jeopardy when engaging in international business. This article suggests that, due to the huge costs of such liability, corporations should improve their legal compliance culture and establish information security management systems. Government authorities should pay attention to the defects in the trade secret protection legal and enforcement systems and should set up appropriate criminal liability and enforcement procedure systems that apply to both natural persons and organizations. Such regulations can serve as means of correcting corporation governance defects and promoting legal compliance culture in corporations. They can also help protect trade secrets and maintain domestic industrial competition.
Translated title of the contribution | Economic Espionage Act and the Indictment of UMC: Perspectives of Long-arm Jurisdiction and Corporate Criminal Liability |
---|---|
Original language | Chinese (Traditional) |
Pages (from-to) | 49-69 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | 月旦法學雜誌 |
Issue number | 297 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2020 |
Keywords
- Economic Espionage
- Long-Arm Jurisdiction
- Conspiracy
- Corporate Criminal Liability
- Trade Secret